“Don’t
assign the whole textbook.” That’s one of the first headings in chapter six of
Daniels and Zemelman’s Subjects Matter,
and what a novel idea it is. That’s not sarcasm, either. A lot of teachers and
administrators could stand to hear that. We are so often concerned with just
covering all the material that we fail to realize that making students read an
entire book is a nearly impossible and Herculean task. Not every aspect of a
content area deserves the same attention and so as educators, we are faced with
the difficult and unfortunate task of having to decide what is important and
deserves our time and consideration and what is not and should be skipped.
Ideally, we would be able to cover all aspects of every subject we teach, but
this is just not practical and is not an effective way to teach, especially in
regards to the use of textbooks.
The
two ideas discussed in this reading that I really liked were jigsawing and the
Guide-o-Rama. This was not the first time I had heard of jigsawing, but I think
this was the first time that I really saw just how effective it could
potentially be, if used correctly. Jigsawing allows you to reduce the workload
(i.e., ridiculous amounts of reading) that students have to do and also
facilitates group discussion, which can be immensely useful in getting students
to open up, think critically, and communicate their ideas with one another. I
thought the Guide-o-Rama was great (despite the cheesy name) for a very
different reason. In those situations where your students will have to slog
through a chapter or two of the book with no reprieve, the Guide-o-Rama can
really help them know what they should be focusing on and to what degree. So
often, textbooks these days are filled with so many asides in the form of
secondary text boxes, graphs, maps, charts, and anecdotes that it can be
difficult to know what to read, what to skip, and what’s actually important.
Providing students with a guide that tells them what to read, with what depth,
and perhaps in what order will undoubtedly make things easier for them. In
addition, the ability to add in your own thoughts and tips will allow the
students to know your feelings about the text and know that you had some
difficulties or questions with it yourself. This is all a part of making yourself
more accessible to the students.
The
chapter on building a community of learners was, to me, the less interesting of
the two. That’s not to say that it doesn’t contain some important information,
though. Establishing your classroom as a safe place for asking questions, an
environment of accountability, and a community where people of all different
backgrounds work towards a common goal is pivotal in being an effective
educator. You need to build students’ trust and bolster their self-esteem so that
they will feel accepted socially, which helps them infinitely academically. I
had a professor a couple of semesters ago who constantly stressed that asking
questions is important, that there is no such a thing as a stupid question, and
that we should not hesitate to ask questions if we had them. That really struck
me, because a lot of teachers may relate that sentiment halfheartedly, but this
professor really seemed to mean it. I think that creating that kind of
atmosphere in a classroom will ultimately lead to a lot of unhindered curiosity
and trust between students and teachers and students and students.
One
thought that I had while reading this chapter had to with the effective use of
textbooks and implementing alternative strategies in the classroom. If, as a
teacher, I decide not to rely so heavily on the textbook, is it acceptable for
me to do sort of a one-off teach-aloud to my students explaining to them the
flaws and limitations of textbooks? I think that that sort of honesty could be
refreshing and encouraging to students who feel that reading textbooks cover to
cover is a laborious and only marginally useful task. At the same time,
however, will that cause problems for me in the long run? Will I run into
opposition from administrators, parents, and fellow teachers if students
develop this sort of anti-textbook mentality? I don’t know the answer to any of
these questions, but it is certainly something I will be giving a lot of
thought to as I move closer to beginning my career as a professional educator.
Hi Kevin - I like your idea of a "textbook exposé" - I think in general it is good to be honest with students and to model what it means to be a critical thinker - and if you are critical of the textbooks in your classroom, you should share that with your students - certainly in the case of inaccuracies - but I would suggest that if you are pointing out the flaws and limitations, you should also point out the things the textbook does well - if there are any of course, but I think in most cases, you can always find a few things - I worry about turning students off entirely from textbooks - while I think they should engage with them critically and see them as only one of many sources of information, I also think they should see them as valuable for what they are and be able to use them when they need to :)
ReplyDelete